headerphoto

 Novel by Christina Carson
Purchase at Amazon Kindle 

Quote from Suffer the Little Children:

"Perhaps what we call misfortune is actually a place where the universe interrupts our habits that keep life so limited and small, forcing us to respond differently. The opportunity it offers depends on how hard we work to close the gap or hold it open, allowing ourselves to glimpse realities we've never glimpsed before."

 





Novel by Christina Carson

Purchase at Amazon Kindle

Quote from Dying to Know:

"I knew in that moment, we were never meant to surrender our childlike innocence, to trade a world in which we fit like a glove for one that hung on us like ill-fitting hand-me-downs. However, all about us insisted on our membership. And instead of a handshake or a mystical password as entrance into this spurious society, we agreed instead to share a lie, the one that says we’re safe, secure, and fulfilled living this way." 

 

 


Contact Me

Welcome Visitors

31856

RSS Subscription

Subscribe

When the Buddhist Monks Came to Town

Posted May 20, 2012

In March of 1959, which for many of you was long before you were born, a group of 38 people stole out of Lasha, Tibet around midnight and walked through the Himalayas to asylum in India. The Dalai Lama, who was only 18 years-old, was in the group as well as two other monks he’d chosen to accompany him. Behind him, he left hundreds
                Lasha, Tibet

 more he knew would soon die in a battle with the Chinese, as they gave their lives to insure his escape. Forty-two years later, Bert and I came to meet one of those monks traveling that night, when we agreed to take on a project for a friend. The event was to bring a small band of Buddhist monks to Huntsville to perform their art. In our first meeting, they created a sand Mandala against the beautiful showcase of Tibetan Art the Huntsville Museum of Art put together. Than one month later, they returned, their dance troupe performing at the Von Braun Center. The following day they held a ceremony for anyone to attend. There, they swept up the mandala, an extraordinary creation out of colored sand taking two weeks of 8-hour days to make, and released it to the waters of Big Spring Park. This marked its journey of return to the sea. How

Sand Mandala could we have known, even beyond the wonder of these young monks, we would also meet their Geshe(teacher), one of the two monks chosen by the Dalai Lama to accompany him out of Lasha that portentous night in history.

Since only one young man spoke any amount of English,  we met on an intuitive basis, recognizing one another in novel ways. The Geshe recognized Bert at a depth most men never see in him, and they became as brothers in that short time. From then on, each  meeting took on a mystical quality. The monks modeled what life looks like when people choose to live in the moment. And never mistake America as an easy experience for these young men – they said very noisy and speedy.     However, they committed to a year on the road and gave themselves to the cause full out. They had hardly a penny in their pockets, living off the largesse of American amazement of them and their art. They were here to raise money to keep the ever increasing number of refugee monks arriving in India fed and clothed at their monastery. So many marvels took place in that short time, like when we stood atop Monte Sano in misty rain of an early spring morning, the monks chanting in response to the peace pole we planted there.  Later, after the ceremony, the Geshe took Bert back to the pole, pointed to the Tibetan phrase for 'Let Peace Prevail,' and showed with his hands, it was upside down. We laughed for a long time.

Grace followed then as when they pulled back into Huntsville late on the night before their performance, and there in the driveway only minutes after their arrival, the front axle of their 15-seater van, pulling a trailer, twisted and broke. Again it was lightly raining, and we sat on the nearby stone wall waiting for the wrecker. But they, like sweet children, laughed, chewed their bubble gum – something new to them – and sat, quiet. I teased the oldest of the men as they off-loaded the trailer. “I thought you monks were to travel with only a towel and a begging bowl.”


In reply, he smiled like a Cheshire cat and pointed to a trunk presently being pulled from the trailer. “Begging bowls in there.” We laughed, again.

My point is that theirs was not an easy life. They had to choose, every morning they woke, to be here, now. This was no cloistered existence but a working order of monks who were tested minute to minute: Could they remain present; could they choose to attend to beauty, wonder and joy, not succumb to their fatigue, their loneliness, their longing for home. Life confronts us daily with a series of choices.  Our lives are not fundamentally different from theirs, except they committed to paying attention to their choices. Thus they gifted us not only with their talent but also with what life looks like when we’re committed to right-minded choices. Whether as writers or human beings our lives hang in the balance of our choices.


One time while watching the Dalai Lama in a TV interview, the interviewer asked him what it was like to be the only Dalai Lama living in exile. One can only imagine the panoply of thoughts that could have invaded his mind in that moment—the memory of hundreds of monks who died for him, all those he was now responsible for, all the politics he had to entertain and excel in, all from a place that is not his home of heart. But what he did instead was chose to remain present. In response to the interviewer, while looking out a bougainvillea-framed window, he replied, “How beautiful these flowers are they not?” Then he was ready to answer.

May we not underestimate ourselves. We all can choose that which nurtures our lives and our art. No one said it was easy, but the reason we get goose bumps around people like the monks and the Dalai Lama is due to their choices well made.

Thoughts from this Vantage Point

Posted May 18, 2012


I’m sixty-six years old. I never imagined being this age, in part because it is hard to imagine, and in part because we are infused with such fear about aging that we avoid thinking about it. However, it is just another vantage point, a different pattern in our kaleidoscopic existence. What fascinates me the most is how strongly aging reveals the ageless quality of life, for as our bodies begin to wear; it is easier to sense something about us that feels no different than it did when we were children. This ageless quality within us, which I call the life force, our spiritual motif, can more easily stand out against an obviously aging body. It’s such a contradiction that it almost makes me want to giggle when I notice it.

How strange and magical to feel so ageless—which to us feels young—inside me, when I look so obviously old. And to think it’s been there all along, generally ignored, our preoccupation being with what’s outside us. We are perpetually distracted by our external world believing that it is what matters, that it has the power to bring us happiness and peace and love if we could just figure it out. 


I could talk about my disappointment with a world that has allowed technology to titillate it into missing the fact that all these gadgets just separates us more and more into isolated units of human loneliness and fear. I could talk about sadness at seeing children no longer roaming the woods bringing homes prizes of box turtles, toads and handfuls of lovely flowers, but instead herded into institutions at early ages, forced into an ever increasing heart-numbing conformity. 

But what I see most from this vantage point, even with all that is different around me, is that we are not changing. And it is the very notion that we think we are changing, that keeps us unaware of what is so. Movement is not change. Our premise is the same as it’s always been.

In that fascinating book, Hanta Yo, I talked about in my blog, The Books that Disturb Us, there is a moving passage that describes life from another vantage point, one which is the heritage of native peoples. Read this and see what it feels like inside you when you do:
The American Indian, even before Columbus, was the remnant of a very old race in its final stage, a race that had attained perhaps the highest working concept of individualism ever practiced. Neither the word ‘free’ nor any corresponding term occurs in the root language, in the primal concept: there never was anything for the Indian to free himself from. His was the spirit not seeking truth but holding onto truth. And his was the mind nourished on choice. Whatever he needed to know, nature sooner or later revealed to him. And that which he desired to know—the best way to achieve his maximum spiritual potential—was the only mystery he chose to investigate….He recognized his spirit—his familiar voice—as a truth bearer that told him what to do, never what not to do; his reasoning mind made the choice to act or not to act. 


Were we to change, we would need to change our premise. We would need to understand that inside matters more than outside; that our fear and pain result from this misunderstanding, not what is happening in the world.

And the book continues:
The rhetorical was the only form of questioning the Indian used; he never answered to anyone but 

himself, never answered for anyone but himself. He conjugates the verb ‘think’ in the first person singular only; he never presumes. His language is rich in expressions of relationships but lacks the relative pronoun and the neuter ‘it.’ ‘He’ and ‘she’ incorporated with other parts of speech. ‘I,’[being] the sacred word; ‘I and you’ if and when an affinity is determined.

Interesting isn’t it, when you think about it. We had a similar philosophic beginning, ours from the great I AM. For some reason, we chose a different premise, and thus a different vantage point. Sitting in my sixty-sixth year, I don’t bother with regrets but do pay attention to this undying yearning to live my remaining years from a different premise, one directed by that ageless creature giggling inside me, who wants me to come in and play.

Toward More Love

Posted May 11, 2012

I’m thinking about Mother’s Day. I’m thinking about the tremendously (adverb intended) challenging experience parenting has become, not because the role has changed, but because it takes more time than most parents can find in the hectic 24 hour revolutions we call our lives. If we needed proof, however, that we must somehow find a new way, Dr. Bernie Siegel, a world renowned medical doctor, offers it in a recent interview I saw. Here is Dr. Siegel’s conclusion from a startling Harvard study relating the occurrence of morbid disease in mid-life to a person’s perception of having been loved as a child or not having been loved.

                      “Parenting is today’s Number One health issue.”

Before you go one thought further, please know this is not about more guilt or blame on parents. What I took from this is how able we are to stand up against all manner of disease, if we are walking through life feeling loved, most especially by our parents. And as parents, this is something we can do more fully, even in the lives we find ourselves. How, you might be asking? It all revolves around being present – meaning being with your child fully when you are with your child. Give them your full attention. This is also known as being in the moment. Time is a concoction of the egoic mind. But when you move outside the confines of the egoic mind – meaning being fully present - there is no sense of time. So whatever seeming time you spend fully present with another leaves both of you feeling as complete as if you’d spent many meaningful hours with one another. Giving your child your full attention
is you loving them.

I write about family in my novels because family functioning properly is THE most important aspect of society, in my view. And without any shame, I’m going to plug my novel
Suffer the Little Children

for through it you can follow Anne Mueller coming to understand how to be present and honest with her own daughter who has run away, as well as a neighbor child about to do the same thing, as their solution to a family not working. For Mother’s Day, share a work of possibility and hope mother to daughter and daughter to mother, opening a door to healing your relationship and your heart. This book offers you that in a real and doable way. It’s my life’s work, shared with you. Let the sharing continue.

                                                    Happy Mother's Day ! 

The Motherbreed

Posted May 5, 2012





I've been sick for the last week. Illness quiets me and soften me around the edges. I began reminiscing about my life as a shepherdess, my adoration and respect for sheep, and the admirable qualities they demonstrate. Sheep have all the merits of the people I most love – kindness, humor, joy, tolerance and toughness. Our breeding program required that we run several different breeds, but one breed fascinated me most of all – the Dorsets – dubbed by the industry, the Motherbreed. The ewes were not the tall, flashy femme fatales called Suffolks.

Nor were they the rugged Rambouillet ladies of the western range. They were close to the ground, short-coupled, dumpy little gals. But when it came to mothering, the only job a ewe is asked to do, no one surpassed them in their ability to deliver and raise healthy lambs. The moniker, Motherbreed, acknowledged them as the best there was. Their unflappable demeanor made them different from most other breeds of ewes. Thus, their lambs lived next to this rock of steadiness and quietude, the little gaffers having no idea what commotion or stress felt like. The challenge in working with Dorsets was just keeping them on their feet, for 30 seconds of inactivity had them dropping down for a nap.  And when you wanted them back up, they’d have a look on their faces that I swear was akin to their saying, “Are you sure this is absolutely necessary?”                                            Dorset Ewe & Lamb
Dorset Ewe and Lamb
                                                                                                          


Loving words as I do, Motherbreed is one that fascinates me. The word almost explains itself by the feeling it creates when you say it. Nor is it meant to be gender-biased, describing instead a high order of excellence. Perhaps we indie writers will form the Motherbreed of this new age of authors and publishers. In a strange twist of fate, we are neither solo nor isolated as our nickname suggests. We are a community, powerfully affected by what we and our associates do. A simple set of principles governs such situations. Do your best and help when you can. These are the qualities of a Motherbreed. And I guarantee you, it is not something that we need invent or cobble together from our minds. It is as innate to us as to Dorsets, and begging only our commitment to know it full out. If you doubt, spend a bit of time around some Dorsets ewes and lambs to see what a thing of beauty life becomes when you live it at the level of the Motherbreed.

Something Real for a Change

Posted April 30, 2012


I've always been a fan of radio. For years, living in northern Alberta, radio was all we had – two stations, one local farm and country broadcast and the national station, CBC, a wonderful medium that joined the two edges of that vast country such that you felt like you all lived in the same small town. We knew the interviewers and talk show hosts like they were are neighbors, and i
f they encountered difficulties or when Barbara Fromm developed cancer, the whole country mourned. It was a sense of community I’d never known before or since.

While I worked for the Alberta government for a short stint, I started doing some radio work myself as well as a couple of local TV shows, but always radio was my favorite. That was all years ago, 

now, so it was with a bit of trepidation that, after seeing Melissa Foster’s interview with Ella Sandwood on Ella’s new endeavor, Spotlight Radio, I approached Ella to see if I could do one too. Ella agreed and little did I know what a treat I was in for.

Ella Sandwood is one fine interviewer, a job that requires a great deal of skill. She is capable of asking interesting and revealing questions and moving with the flow of the interview to keep the listener entertained and engaged. She is currently looking for people who can talk about various topics, so you might want to contact her if you too like talking on the radio. As well, she has an array of ad and digital services that may meet your promotional needs.


In a world that is increasingly virtual, I invite you to grab a cup of coffee and spend 15 minutes with Ella and me  that will make both of us more real to you. Real is good. Come have some fun.

We Call the Game

Posted April 18, 2012


I, perhaps like you, ponder often these days on how we writers can create the readership and sales we need. Yesterday, I was comparing a small sampling of indie publishers in the Kindle Store Top 100 Best Sellers (paid), looking for commonalities that might explain their presence there. Well, I have to admit, I ended laughing. No one was doing what I had assumed we must do: blog often, tweet lots, or have a website to capture followers. I am not being critical of them. Rather, it suggests how perplexing book marketing has become almost overnight, with its horde of writers and readers showing up at the gate of the only major franchise in town.  It’s a new game, even for this life-long entrepreneur.

There have been plenty of new games in my life where I faced a problem that I had no idea how to solve. In my early years, it resulted in much foot-stomping, whining, and frustration. It took time for me to recognize that two eventualities continually presented themselves in all such cases. The first was – a solution appeared. The second was I could never figure out how. And though the solutions were characterized by a lack of logic or reason, you couldn't argue with the results. 

Such results do, however, need one more element.  You must reach a place of heart where you know beyond all doubt the solution will arise. That’s called intent, and intent is the sole directive in the creative process. Since we set the intent, we indeed call the game. In a strange twist, it's not ours to solve the problem; it's ours to commit totally to the promise of its solution. And I'll tell you, I’m a believer; I’ve seen it happen too many times to sideline myself in skepticism. 

My farming years provided the bellwether example of this uncanny way in which the universe works, if we'll just do what’s ours to do and leave the rest to what we inappropriately refer to as fate. I farmed in the era I described as the agricultural equivalent of the last of the Mohicans. Interest rates were topping 28%, fuel had quadrupled in cost, and lamb prices had dropped 10¢ a pound. In that historically enduring sector of society, even suicides occurred.  And yet we endured.  Our financial picture defied all reason. Our net income of the preceding three years was unarguably too small to live on, yet there we were. My partner and I stared, speechless at the bottom line, and shook our heads. We never did figure out how we were still on the land.   But what I realized in retrospect was: we had called that game. Years earlier, without a hint of doubt, we agreed we would make it; and that we would produce a world grand champion ram to boot. Logically, both were unlikely, but we managed both. So in times of stress and confusion, I would suggest you apply yourself to shoring up your intent, until you are sure there is no doubt left. For that’s how creative we humans truly are.

There is a wonderful story my husband tells, and I'm using it to close this piece. It occurred during an interview by a top sports commentator of a well-known retiring professional umpire. The umpire had had a long and distinguished career, so it seemed almost an afterthought when the commentator asked one last question. He turned to the ump and inquired, “Do you have regrets about any of the balls or strikes you called?” 

The umpire smiled in a knowing way, his answer a profound truth about how our world works. He said only this, “No, because they weren’t balls or strikes until I called them.” 

This I know. We call the game.  And if you would like a life of less angst and no regrets, I encourage you to know it too.

Promise Me This

Posted April 13, 2012


One of my friends of forty years once said to me about twenty years back, after going to a fantasy movie with her young son, “Kids don’t need fantasy; adults do.” And we both laughed. Young kids still know the birds talk to you if you’ll listen. They know imaginary friends aren’t necessarily imaginary. And they trust everything will be just fine. That’s why they smile when they wake up, bounce when they walk, and pat your face when they see you sad. Until they are submerged by words, they know the world as a fantastic affair that happens for them every day.

That’s why I have always loved reading “kid’s books,” the classic literature supposedly written for our children. Wind in the Willows, Mary Poppins, Alice in Wonderland, Charlotte’s Web, The Velveteen Rabbit, and my all-time favorite, Winnie-the-Pooh. Watch who cries more, laughs harder and smiles most, you or the child you’re reading to. In our head-long rush to grow up, especially these days, what we abandon is the part of us that knows the world as whimsy, that part of us that expects a bird to sit on our shoulder or a bunny to nibble our toes. I don’t think we mean to leave these possibilities behind us, but in the grown-up world we’re offered, suddenly we have doubts about all sorts of things: how pretty we are, how strong we can be, or how smart. Then fear comes to own us, and the soft, sweet world of childhood hardens into a world of us and them, rather than family of Life we knew it as before. As Mary Oliver points out in her poem,
“The Lilies Break Open Over the Dark Water:"

But the lilies
are slippery and wild—they are
devoid of meaning, they are
simply doing, from the deepest spurs of their being,
what they are impelled to do
every summer.
And so, dear sorrow, are you.

Only, what we became impelled to do was doubt our whimsy, relinquish are awareness of what we truly are, and believe plodding is more appropriate than bouncing through our day. It is a belief, only a belief. There are no facts to support that choice. So when we open a child’s storybook, that’s why our heart quickens, because that author gives us permission, once again, to remember that once-upon-a-time never grows old.

In our day job, we own a small photography business in which we photograph children at childcare facilities. Last year, we designed a set for Winnie the Pooh, and the kids love it. But they’re not the only ones, for one night our thirty-something-year-old photographer and her sixty-six-year-old friend, me, found ourselves role playing with all the folks from the Hundred Acre Woods and laughing ourselves silly. One of the poses we designed is the photo you see here. I tell the parents of the kids, “Be sure your child takes this one with them when their leaving home to start their own lives.” For I would love fewer of us to lose our trust in fantasy. This is what Christopher Robin says to Pooh on the sign:

Promise me you’ll always remember
you’re braver than you believe,
and stronger than you seem,
and smarter than you think.

We’re writers. We hold the power to tell the tales that either confirm life as we now know it or suggest that there are other ways. In this strange new age of writing and publishing, where angst, frustration and doubt are so near, let us turn to the wisdom of Christopher Robin and post it where we can always see what he so aptly suggests. For would a little boy or a little bear lie?

Triberr Oops!

Posted April 10, 2012

This blog is dedicated to all my tribe mates. It is my apology to you, and if you’ll read on you’ll understand why. Ignorance is bliss only as long as the consequences of one’s choices have not yet shown up. Saturday night, around 1:30 AM, I saw in all its gory detail what my Luddite-type attitude toward social media platforms and tools had wrought me, and unfortunately, you too. 

When Facebook came out, I shunned it, eventually creating a site but rarely visiting it. This was before I’d published my first Kindle novel, and had no interest in social media. I remember hearing talk of President Obama tweeting and wondering what people were referring to. I went on in that fairy tale social media vacuum, until I hit the “save and publish” button at Amazon and became a published author. But instead of assuming full responsibility for what was now mine, the task of building a readership and selling my book, I put a great deal of energy into resistance where social media was concerned, walking stooped-shouldered to my computer, plopping down in my chair, sighing loudly enough for my husband to hear me across the room, and introducing myself to Twitter. Then came the Twitter tools: TweetAdder, Twiping, Tweepi, and eventually Contaxio. I managed reasonably well with those, but when Triberr arrived, outstanding application that it is, I didn’t want another learning curve in my life. With this donkey-like attitude, I took on Triberr. It was that time of year when our business was at flood stage, I had just published a second novel, and the thought of writing multiple blogs each week filled me with dread, and I let it. I knew better, but being right appeared more satisfying in that moment than getting the job done. 

Last night, I realized how well I had ignored every warning sign, every clue that I was doing something wrong. My blunder was to assume the Tiberr approval button was synonymous with a send button like with e-mails or tweets. When I clicked on it, I presumed the post wafted into the ether and on to twitter.  Then pleased I had fulfilled my commitment, and being the tidy freak I am, I would go up to the red X in the little circle and clear that post out, ready for the next. I heard people, including my husband, talk about plugged Sent Streams, and I marveled how that was never my problem. I saw in that box that appears, when you hover your cursor over someone’s photo, the perpetual zero in the box stating I shared # of your posts. It bothered me, but I chalked it up to yet another glitch in Triberr, still convinced I was doing my job. But when those little photos of who was sending out your post never pictured me over on Bert’s computer, a nasty sense that I was somehow the problem surfaced through the denial. Nicole Cook, bless her, answered my bonfire question as to what was going on with these photos, and with that explanation, I began to put the pieces together and realize what I’d done. When I ran it past my husband, Bert, he patiently explained the difference between approve and send. I sat there as the realization hit me. I said to him, “Oh my god, I haven’t sent a single post out since I’ve been on Triberr!”

This morning is a new day dawning. I know because my Sent Stream is as plugged up as yours. However, I’m rejoicing in it, because to me it means I’m finally on the team in my heart and mind, and I’ll be truly supporting you now as you have so steadfastly been doing for me.

Books That Disturb Us

Posted April 6, 2012


A book sits on the short shelf above our bed where I keep my treasures. It is a book that elicited heated debates, accusations, cruel judgments and little praise when first published. It was commissioned, in a sense, by a man in his seventh decade, a man who was one of the few remaining who still knew the suppressed songs and ceremonies of the Dakotah. His name was Chunksa Yuha, and for forty years, he searched for a writer to record what he knew. He said many approached him, wanting an “as told to” story, all looking for the blood, gore and glory of a warrior saga, but none agreed to take the time, years most likely, “to enter into an understanding of the Indian as a man of habitual spiritual consciousness.” That is how Chunksa Yuha described it. To do this, according to Chunksa Yuha, the writer would have to discard almost every concept relative to Indians formulated by the whiteman. In other words, whoever was to write this book had to lay aside their notions about most everything in their world and step into another, one that was neither fantasy nor fiction; one that housed the hearts and minds of a race of people so truly in touch with the nature of life that it disturbed our race deeply.
               Ruth Beebe and Chunksa Yuha
You may think of disturbing books as those that are filled with the horror mankind is capable of, but I suggest that the most disturbing books are those that reveal to us our undeveloped capacities to live expressly as our true nature instructs us to, were we to listen. Thus, Hanta Yo, was a disturbing book and Ruth Beebe Hill spent twenty years bringing it to life. To do it, she had to learn the language clear down to its idiom. Language is that powerful, that transformative, that creative. And like it or not, admit to it or not, language suggests something about us that we have yet to own. So when a book comes along that describes fellow human beings who did not disavowal the awareness and responsibilities that accrue naturally to our species, it is definitely disturbing to many.

Chunksa Yuha said that the writer had to start by understanding what Indians meant by the word, spiritual, how they began with the spirit of man and worked down through the laws of the universe: Taku skanskan, something-in-movement, spiritual vitality.

We mistakenly think that the world exists, and we come along and describe it through language. What if it were the other way round, that we create the world with our thoughts and words; that rather than scribes, we are artists?

In the Dakotah language, the following words, plus the concepts for which they stood, did not exist: admit, assume, because, believe, could, doubt, end, expect, faith, forget, forgive, guilt, how, it, mercy, pest, promise, should, sorry, storm, them, us, waste, we, weed. Notice what notions you'd have to abandon to accommodate that list. 

We as writers are the keepers of language and thus the most active creators of worlds. That's a great deal to be answerable for.  What would a Dakotah Sioux have suggested in the face of such responsibility? Well since they didn’t have the concepts supported by words like because, sorry, assume or end, for starters, they likely would have said something like: Be as you are. Know what that is. Live only that.


The Masters

Posted April 2, 2012

I was twelve years old, had just finished reading Wuthering Heights and was pondering, which I did regularly. I walked to the kitchen where my mum was cooking dinner, leaned against the wall and asked, “Who decides who the Masters are? Who decided that Beethoven was great or Rembrandt or Emily Bronte or Shakespeare and how come so many people agree? What defines greatness?” I was young. I was curious. Mum looked at me for a second, smiled, and she shook her head slowly, while shrugging her shoulders.

 

I didn’t let the question go. I couldn’t, for it seemed so odd to me to have such universal agreement about something so nebulous. As my life moved on, I heard people discussing the Great Ones, tying their greatness to advances in theory or technique in their time, or superb or inventive style changes, or mastery of character or plot, but I still wasn’t sold. People who knew nothing of these academic assessments still responded to the great ones like subjects before royalty.  And stranger still, research had shown Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony increased milk production in dairy cows, and I don’t think it had anything to do with the suggestion of grass in the title. In fact, one group of dairy cows exposed to a staged performance of selected passages from Shakespeare’s Merry Wives of Windsor increased production by four percent, when dairy animals normally react to disruptions in their environment by decreasing production. Relaxation was the explanation from farmers and researchers. I, for one, didn’t buy it, at least not as a complete explanation. So what is it about the Masters that we somehow intuitively grasp, which if understood could point toward helping all of us prefect our art.

Friends often accused me of being a perfectionist. It wasn’t true, for neither life nor art was meant to follow in anyone else’s footsteps, and perfection to me meant exceeding some previously determined standard. Finally, in frustration, I said to a friend who insisted it was so, “Think of it this way. It’s just so much more satisfying  being the best you can be, for let’s face it, who would you rather dance like, me or Nureyev? Who has the more astounding experiences within their Art if not the Masters? It’s not perfection I seek; I want to know that feeling where everything comes together in a moment.” Then it hit me. That’s what the masters offer us, the possibility of experiencing that with them.

Something happens inside us when we encounter a moment where everything comes together exactly as it should. Don’t you occasionally write a sentence and sit in amazement, wondering where it came from, while its lyricism, or appropriateness, wisdom, or beauty holds you in its magic? How about when five basketball players suddenly meld into one on-going intent, and let us all experience being in the zone? That suggests to me there is an inherent recognition of perfect harmony in us all. When the elements of music, painting, writing or movement reach their zenith of expression, that moment lets us experience the heights to which we humans can rise.

 

I once read a story about a seeker who approached a Sage with the question of how to become enlightened. The Sage said to him, “You know how when you think a thought it is then followed by silence. Increase the length of the silence.”

 

Great Art appears to occur from a similar practice. Since it offers us the experience of a moment of utter harmony, the challenge becomes to string more of those moments together. Those who do that in a grand way are who we call The Masters. But in our very recognition of those moments, one other truth emerges. We cannot recognize something we cannot conceive. Those moments live in us all; greatness is our human legacy.


View older posts »